Diet or Deity?: A Study of Cows in Indian Society
By: Johanna Mazer, Mariam Martinez, and Abigail Richard
The perception of cows throughout history has varied from different cultural lenses. Globally cows are most commonly seen as a food source for their meat and for their milk. All around the world they are also viewed as a source of leather, a source of economic gain, sacred animals in religion, and wild animals in nature. Cows in India were recently banned from being slaughtered in animal markets in 2015 (Gundimeda and Ashwin 171). This has caused an intensified debate addressing speciesism which has led to unethical actions and violence.
These opposing viewpoints have been influenced by a number of factors including politics, religion, education, residence, and economics (Gundimeda and Ashwin 156). This debate created a schism between Muslims and Hindus in particular (Kale 493). Many lifestyles of the people living in India revolve around their perception of cows. People practicing any religion, farmers, and butchers are particularly affected by this governmental policy. Social institutions have polarized the perception of cows and negatively impacted minorities in India, raising awareness of the need for environmental justice. Coming to an ethical conclusion on the cow ban involves consideration of all stakeholders.
Key Words
Table of Contents
Works Cited
Ancient India-Sacred Cows and Ayurveda. [San Francisco, California, USA] : Kanopy Streaming, 2015., 2015. EBSCOhost http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00074a&AN=muscat.b28543269&site=eds-live.
Basu, Pratyusha. “Success and Failure of Crossbred Cows in India: A Place-Based Approach to Rural Development.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 99, no. 4, 2009, pp. 746–766. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20621241.
Cooper, Olivia. “How does India’s Stance on Cattle Slaughter Affect Farmers.” The Cattle Site, 16, January 2016. http://www.thecattlesite.com/articles/4310/how-does-indias-stance-on-cattle-slaughter-affect-farmers/
Gundimeda, Sambaiah, and V. S. Ashwin. “Cow Protection in India: From Secularising to Legitimating Debates.” South Asia Research, vol. 38, no. 2, July 2018, p. 156. EBSCOhost,http://ezpro.cc.gettysburg.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edo&AN=129941478&site=eds-live.
Human Rights Watch. “Violent Cow Protection in India: Vigilante Groups Attack Minorities.” February, 2019. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/india0219_web3.pdf
Kale, Rajiv B., et al. “Future Aspirations and Planning of Dairy Farmers in India: Horizon
2020.” Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, vol. 88, no. 4, Apr. 2018, p. 493. EBSCOhost,
Kumar, Anjani, et al. “Impact of Traditional versus Modern Dairy Value Chains on Food
Security: Evidence from India’s Dairy Sector.” Food Policy, vol. 83, Feb. 2019, pp.
260–270. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.010.
Mudgil, Deepak, and Sheweta Barak. “Synthetic Milk: A Threat to Indian Dairy Industry.”
Carpathian Journal of Food Science & Technology, vol. 5, no. 1/2, Dec. 2013, pp. 64–68.
Nadal, Deborah. “Cows Caught in the Crossfire: Provisional Remarks on India’s Current Cow-Slaughter Debate.” Religions of South Asia, vol. 10, no. 1, 2016, pp. 79–102. EBSCOhost,http://ezpro.cc.gettysburg.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rfh&AN=ATLAiEYD170227000682&site=eds-live.
Sagari R Ramdas. Bovine Politics and Climate Justice. Economic & Political Weekly, October 13,2018.https://advance.lexis.com/api/document?collection=news&id=urn:contentItem:5TGF-0861-JB5M-W4BR-00000-00&context=1516831.
Sanford, A.Whitney. “Gandhi’s Agrarian Legacy: Practicing Food, Justice, and Sustainability in India.” Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture, vol. 7, no. 1, Mar. 2013, pp. 65–87.EBSCOhost,http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=87668488&site=eds-lve
Sarkar, Radha and Amar Sarkar. “Sacred Slaughter: An Analysis of Historical, Communal, and Constitutional Aspects of Beef Bans in India.” Politics, Religion & Ideology, vol. 17, no. 4, Dec. 2016.